On Tue, Jun 20, 2000 at 01:38:10PM -0500, David Starner wrote: > > don't think it's in the current policy yet. Is there a policy for editor? > > If there isn't, how should I decide my priority? > I don't believe there is a policy, but glancing at /v/l/d/alt/editor and > simple reasoning says that editor should be console based, and a good > common denominator for the users on the system - i.e. something easy > to use without much training. Anyone who wants something specialized can > set it that way. (By this reasoning, vim should not have the level it > does. I'm tempted to file a bug (wishlist) on vim on the matter.) What I see in /v/l/d/a/editor is the priorities are random now. In my system, /bin/ae 20 /usr/bin/joe 70 /usr/bin/nano 40 (I copied from Pico, IIRC) /usr/bin/vim 20 And I don't think a priority of 70 conforms to any rationale. Should there be policy for this, as for x-w-m? -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es || Rediscovering Freedom, aka Oskuro in || jordi@sindominio.net || Using Debian GNU/Linux Reinos de Leyenda || jordi@debian.org || http://debian.org http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/917A225E telnet pusa.uv.es 23 73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC 2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
Attachment:
pgpjrK67psnDT.pgp
Description: PGP signature