Re: General Resolution: Removing non-free
Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de> writes:
> Software is in non-free for different reasons. What is with DFSG software
> that is affected by patents in some countries? It is in non-free and
> perhaps you can't use it in some countries without paying a fee, but in
> all other countries it is perfectly free software.
This is a separate issue, and really calls for something like
country-specific package pools or something (non-us seems no longer
sufficient). I don't know what the solution is, but just sticking
them in non-free is probably not adequate now.
Reply to: