Re: lintian and binary plugins
so, is it correct that plugins are not treated as
shared libraries under policy? [so this isn't really
a policy violation, just a lintian false-negative]
perhaps lintian could ignore .so files
outside of /lib, /usr/lib, /usr/X11R6/lib?
[maybe alternate libraries, like libc5-compat,
will mess this idea up...]
On Wed, 7 Jun 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
> > drgenius (in incoming) has .so plugins and lintian chockes on it.
> > i had to move the .so link in the -dev package.
> lintian just needs to be told to shut up for plugins, most likely
> by using an override. I know it supports per-package overrides,
> but how exactly to do that doesn't seem to be documented :(
> / Generally uninteresting signature - ignore at your convenience \
> | firstname.lastname@example.org http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
> | 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |