On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 01:28:05PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote: > To debian-packaging-manual, debian-developers-reference, debian-maint-guide, > debian-doc? The last one would be okay (although then it would be named > differently than doc-linux*, which was the original, I guess), but the other > three are way too long. (and yes, that's as much as a cosmetical remark as > is the wish to rename them :) I personally prefer those long names if they introduce a "name convention" to debian-related documentation packages. > Besides, if we rename them, they wouldn't get automatically upgraded > anymore, unless we put dummy packages in place, which is Ugly(TM). Yes, but the current names are also ugly :) IMHO, people who need these 4 packages know how to find the replacements easily. Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez || jordi@pusa.informat.uv.es || Rediscovering Freedom, ka Oskuro in RL-MUD || jordi@sindominio.net || Using Debian GNU/Linux http://sindominio.net GnuPG public information: pub 1024D/917A225E telnet pusa.uv.es 23 73ED 4244 FD43 5886 20AC 2644 2584 94BA 917A 225E
Attachment:
pgpZ87NcORLIz.pgp
Description: PGP signature