Re: bsdutils claims to provide kill, which is wrong (was Re: Bug#64460: whois package shouldn't be Priority: important, rather optional)

To: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bsdutils claims to provide kill, which is wrong (was Re: Bug#64460: whois package shouldn't be Priority: important, rather optional)
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 10:26:30 +1000
Message-id: <[🔎] 200005230026.KAA19799@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20000522151918.C25136@molehole.dhis.org> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0005221903530.24896-100000@colossus.bilow.com> <[🔎] 20000523101607.A23593@eye-net.com.au>

Craig Small <csmall@eye-net.com.au> wrote:

> The other thing is that procps is required, so I don't think you need
> dependencies.

Yes you do, only essential packages can be used without a dependency.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

Reply to:

References:
- Re: bsdutils claims to provide kill, which is wrong (was Re: Bug#64460: whois package shouldn't be Priority: important, rather optional)
  - From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)

Prev by Date: Re: bsdutils claims to provide kill, which is wrong (was Re: Bug#64460: whois package shouldn't be Priority: important, rather optional)
Next by Date: Re: Talk about Debian: what can I say?
Previous by thread: Re: bsdutils claims to provide kill, which is wrong (was Re: Bug#64460: whois package shouldn't be Priority: important, rather optional)
Next by thread: Re: bsdutils claims to provide kill, which is wrong (was Re: Bug#64460: whois package shouldn't be Priority: important, rather optional)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread