Related note

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Fri, 19 May 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:

> On a related note, I sometimes see discussion on debian-devel about
> whether a bug really is release-critical.  Such discussion is good
> and useful for gathering consensus.  But discussing, agreeing, and
> then doing nothing will do nothing.  Please follow up on such decisions.

Have you already decided what to do with the most visible wrong 
priorities? (the ones affecting packages installed by default).

Example: libgdbmg1 and console-data should be required, and they are not.

This is bad for people who want to install only packages above a given 
priority value. Would it be too much trouble to fix these priorities 
now, or would this have to be considered "severity: important" for that?

Thanks.