Re: Finger daemons in Debian should use a virtual package
On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 09:27:10PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > You can't remove your entry selectively: update-inetd --remove will remove
> > all finger-related entries, because the --pattern option doesn't work with
> > --remove.
> Wrong. the argument to --remove is the pattern.
Doh! Maybe I was just being thick, but the behaviour...
> > it doesn't abort with an error because of false arguments, it just
> > silently ignores it and continue.
...instantly led me to believe otherwise. That should be fixed.
--
Digital Electronic Being Intended for Assassination and Nullification
Reply to: