On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 10:42:27AM -0700, Philip Brown wrote: > a) his message wasn't written 100% "politely", so I'm ignoring it > b) it's from him, so I'm ignoring it > c) the things he said just aren't true > > I''m hoping it is c. Because I think the issues he raised are something > that debian should be concerned about. So we have one party complaining that we're concentrating too much on features and not enough on quality--we have a much larger party complaining that we concentrate too much on quality and not enough on features. The message in question contained very little in the way of specifics and quite a lot of inflammatory rhetoric. Since it's obvious that we *cannot* please everyone, it would seem that there are more productive things to do than respond to non-substantive flames from someone whose immediate personal requirements aren't being met. If you think there's a larger issue that needs to be addressed, please restate it in a constructive fashion that might lead to a reasonable discussion. -- Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgpNybOmu1yzS.pgp
Description: PGP signature