xlib6g (was: Splitting isdnutils & co. into non-X and X parts)
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: xlib6g (was: Splitting isdnutils & co. into non-X and X parts)
- From: Robert Bihlmeyer <robbe@orcus.priv.at>
- Date: 01 May 2000 20:36:21 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87n1maxgm2.fsf_-_@hoss.orcus.priv.at>
- In-reply-to: "W. Borgert"'s message of "Sat, 29 Apr 2000 10:21:12 +0000"
- References: <3908924F.AAB417E9@vianova.at> <20000428194229.B11094@ecn.purdue.edu> <20000429102112.A10994@knorke.in-berlin.de>
"W. Borgert" <debacle@knorke.in-berlin.de> writes:
> Nevertheless, I think that it's no so nice, that a lot of
> typical non-X packages or packages that I like to have on
> non-X machines (e.g. aalib1, bb, cdrdao, emacs20, gnokii,
> mtools, tetex-bin, ...) depend on the relatively large
> xlib6g package.
Probably because having to maintain two versions of these packages
would be too much hassle for too little gain (i.e. small gains for a
minority).
> I work console-only 99% of the time and have one machine, where
> xlib6g/xfree86-common (size 4492K) is only installed because of
> mtools (size 311K).
Perhaps trimming xlib6g somewhat could help? As I see it this package
is just the libs for X clients. So why does it include the xkb stuff
(1 MB)? And why force the documentation-part of xfree86-common on
people (340 kB)? Too small savings?
--
Robbe
Reply to: