Re: wrong priorities in the override file for potato
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 11:39:10AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Ben Collins wrote:
> > > Anything that deps on libncurses4 should be recompiled against libncurses5.
> > Should I take this in the sense that a standard or higher package which
> > depends on libncurses4 deserves an important bug to be recompiled?
> No. Potato will ship with libncurses4, so it is not a release-critical
> problem for a package to be linked with it.
So its priority has to be raised in potato, hasn't it?
"843b68fe83edf9d89bc0a8358064bc7e" (a truly random sig)