Re: How do I solve messed up package version numbers?
On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 07:22:09PM +1000 , Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 10:00:23AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> > I made a silly mistake in the version numbers of postgresql. The package in
> > woody is 7.0-0.beta3-1 instead of 7.0-0.beta3.1.
>
> Huh? Why do you want beta3 in the debian revision? Isn't the beta3 part
> to do with the upstream version?
>
> Are these betas of 7.0? ie, is 7.0 meant to be better than 7.0beta3? You
> can use versions like `7.0-release-1' to get around this when the
this is ugly. I thought everyone abandoned this after the glibc-2.0.7pre
problems.
> release happens.
cause it's not, that the upstream calls it?
Petr Cech
--
Debian GNU/Linux maintainer - www.debian.{org,cz}
cech@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
<sgore> "Debian - 3 million penguins can't be wrong."
Reply to: