Re: USB-backport 2.3.x for 2.2.14 in potato
>> How stable is this code? Are there any major issues known? What >>percentage
>> of the hardware supported by 2.3.x is supported by the backport? >>What all
>> resides in userspace? I think these are the questions relevant to >>getting
>> such a major subsystem included into a deeply frozen distribution.
>> Stability depends on the device. Keyboards/mice/joysticks(HID), >>boring
>stuff, has been stable for quite some time. All three host >controler
>drivers are stable enough for basic use.
It seems at least the HID stuff could easilly implemented.