[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: A "progressive" distribution



 
Michael Stone wrote:

  On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 03:27:18PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
  > On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Ed Szynaka wrote:
  > > > How does this account for drastic changes to something like libc that
  > > > might take weeks or months to shake out?
  >
  > Build daemons could take care of the 90% or so of packages that would just
  > need a recompile.

  That ignores the arguments over what needs to be recompiled, the time
  needed to discover problems, the time needed to make the compilations
  work, etc. Build daemons are not omnipotent. (Otherwise they'd be build
  deities...I digress.)
 
 

All right. Why doesn't anyone take the tools developed in mozilla.org seriously?
I think their build tracking tools are quite excellent. I'm sure that it would be a breeze to
hinge a debian source build back-end to that and get it up and running together with
the fancy web interface.
 

 
  --
  Mike Stone

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature

-- 
 ++++-+++-+++-++-++-++--+---+----+----- ---  --  -  - 
 +  Eray "eXa" Ozkural                   .      .   .  . . .
 +  CS, Bilkent University, Ankara             ^  .  o   .      .
 |  mail: erayo@cs.bilkent.edu.tr                .  ^  .   .
 
Reply to: