Re: The nature of unstable (was: Danger Will Robinson! Danger!)
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 08:42:07AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> this same empirical evidence has also proved that 'stable' is LESS
> stable and reliable and secure than 'unstable'. the few debian boxes
> which i know of that have been compromised were cracked BECAUSE they
> were still running stable and had older versions of various programs
> which had known security holes.
Uh, which were the packages in question? Did you report it at the time?
--
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name
Reply to: