Re: netstd split results in loss of functionality
License problems: namely, there isn't one, and it's not clearly public
domain, and nobody knows who the author is.
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Daniel Martin wrote:
> Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Why doesn't netstd depend: on all the packages it previously included?
> > When upgrading to potato, tftpd functionality is lost because the new
> > netstd only suggests it. And the parameters to tftpd have changed
> > and the new package does not update the inetd entry.
>
> Speaking of which, where did netdate go? I've been wondering for a
> while what happened to it.
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
You mean you can only become totally invisible when
nobodie's watching you?
Reply to: