Re: Mozilla M14
> > I see that lots of people are saying that M14 is less usable than M13,
> > so it would be a bad idea to replace M13 by M14 in potato, if that's
> > what anyone is suggesting.
> In my limited experience, I've found M14 to be a *significant* improvement
> over M13 in terms of both stability and speed (but especially speed).
> I'm running it from the packaged tarball (from the mozilla web site) on
> an up to date potato.
I would agree. I have had no significant problems out of M14 yet. I have
also been using the tarball on an up to date potato. I believe that M14
should certainly replace M13 in potato.