Re: Bug#55933: This package needs to be re-compiled

To: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com>
Cc: tj@sgic.fi, 55933@bugs.debian.org, Debian Developers' Forum <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#55933: This package needs to be re-compiled
From: Torsten Landschoff <t.landschoff@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 03:02:29 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20000126030228.A1830@wormhole.galaxy>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87901hsraf.fsf@bittersweet.intra>; from Karl M. Hegbloom on Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 01:57:44PM -0800
References: <m12C7cl-001gzYC@shakti.kos.su> <[🔎] 87901hsraf.fsf@bittersweet.intra>

On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 01:57:44PM -0800, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:

>  `guile-scsh' should either be removed from the archive or taken over
>  by someone who actually uses it.  I do not have time for it now.

How about just orphaning it? I get the impression some of us are too keen
to get a package withdrawn from the distribution.

Shall I recompile the package and orphan it?

cu
    Torsten

-- 
Torsten Landschoff           Bluehorn@IRC               <torsten@debian.org>
           Debian Developer and Quality Assurance Committee Member

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#55933: This package needs to be re-compiled
  - From: Tuomas Jormola <tj@sgic.fi>
- Re: Bug#55933: This package needs to be re-compiled
  - From: Michael Stone <mstone@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Bug#55933: This package needs to be re-compiled
  - From: karlheg@bittersweet.inetarena.com (Karl M. Hegbloom)

Prev by Date: Re: slink->potato: mutt going bezerk
Next by Date: Re: cannot sign anymore
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#55933: This package needs to be re-compiled
Next by thread: Re: Bug#55933: This package needs to be re-compiled
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread