[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: policy summary



On Sat, Jan 22, 2000 at 04:06:33PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote:
> Here's what's been happening on debian-policy lately. Let me know about
> consensuses I have missed.

I'm afraid I don't understand what your criteria are for determining
consensus; I made my 9 X policy proposals on the same day.  It looks to me
like all of them have been seconded by a sufficient number of maintainers
except one ("to build with X support or not"), and even that one hasn't
been argued about lately.

I really think that all my X proposals except the one qualify as accepted
amendments.

And even that one I think has passed muster, but I might need a reminder as
to how exactly anyone thinks it fails to be an improvement over the current
situation.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson            |    Human beings rarely imagine a god that
Debian GNU/Linux               |    behaves any better than a spoiled child.
branden@ecn.purdue.edu         |    -- Robert Heinlein
roger.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpnmAM2cx0Xc.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: