Re: Many packages depend on non-existant libstdc++2.9

To: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Many packages depend on non-existant libstdc++2.9
From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 11:10:17 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 38752EE9.31D84B0C@cupid.suninternet.com>
References: <[🔎] 3874A34C.3EECCF73@cupid.suninternet.com> <[🔎] 20000106151736.E8839@finlandia.infodrom.north.de>

Martin Schulze wrote:
> 
> Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > PS. Did the mailing list archive give up on the new year?
> 
> Y2k bug...

Nice. Is it going to be fixed anytime soon?

Martijn

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Many packages depend on non-existant libstdc++2.9
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>

References:
- Many packages depend on non-existant libstdc++2.9
  - From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@cupid.suninternet.com>
- Re: Many packages depend on non-existant libstdc++2.9
  - From: Martin Schulze <joey@finlandia.Infodrom.North.DE>

Prev by Date: Re: Y2k problems with lists archives
Next by Date: Re: [dms22@cam.ac.uk: Bug#54193: Mutt 1.0 under slink lacks dotlock]
Previous by thread: Re: Many packages depend on non-existant libstdc++2.9
Next by thread: Re: Many packages depend on non-existant libstdc++2.9
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread