Re: proftpd
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Steve Lamb wrote:
> Thursday, November 04, 1999, 2:14:14 PM, Florian wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 02, 1999 at 12:28:18AM +0100, David Weinehall wrote:
> >> Guess I'll use another ftp-server from now on, because I can't possibly
> >> defend using programs that behaves this way. I'm sorry, because I really
> >> liked proftd, but my disk-space is limited, and several small unnecessary
> >> libraries quickly adds up.
>
> > AGREE
>
> > Two choices i see:
>
> > - Split up proftpd in two packages a plain and a sql "enabled" proftpd.
> > - Let people wanting to use sql recompile the package (Easy switch in
> > debian/rules) ...
>
> [snippage]
>
> > Flo (Who does not like this bloat)
>
> Can we also apply this to packages that have both console and X versions?
> Quite frankly I think it is foolish that vim requires X to run on the console.
> The same with mtr. Both packages might easily be found on a headless, X-less
> computer running some basic functionality.
At least for VIM there's luckily enough a vim-tty package that works quite
fine.
/David
_ _
// David Weinehall <tao@acc.umu.se> /> Northern lights wander \\
// Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky //
\> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ </ Full colour fire </
Reply to: