Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?

To: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?
From: Josip Rodin <joy@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
Date: Sat, 9 Oct 1999 18:36:48 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19991009183648.D32703@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 19991005192027.C7329@ecn.purdue.edu>
References: <[🔎] 199910011822.OAA15652@mixing.qc.dfo.ca> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.991005112132.3166A-100000@cantor.unex.es> <[🔎] 19991005192027.C7329@ecn.purdue.edu>

On Tue, Oct 05, 1999 at 07:20:27PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> But just to err on the side of caution, would anyone doing what Santiago is
> doing PLEASE recompile their packages against the latest versions of the
> potato libraries shortly before the potato freeze?
> 
> Mixed slink/potato systems are temporary things.  Potato will be around for
> a long time.  So let us please make it internally consistent.

Programs compiled against slink xlib6g libraries won't run correctly
when run with potato xlib6g libraries installed?

-- 
enJoy -*/\*- don't even try to pronounce my first name

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>

References:
- recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?
  - From: Peter S Galbraith <GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca>
- Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
- Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@ecn.purdue.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: Some developers still using slink?
Next by Date: Re: ITP: screem
Previous by thread: Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?
Next by thread: Re: recompile needed for xlib6g (>= 3.3.5-1) instead of (>= 3.3.2.3a-2) ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread