Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?

To: Debian developers list <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 1999 13:59:10 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.990303135643.3182A-100000@cantor.unex.es>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199903031225.NAA09057@ezili.sis.pasteur.fr>

About binary compatibility:

What exactly does mean "ncurses will have to be recompiled"?

Will a libncurses4-linked program work if we upgrade libc6 to libc6_2.1?

-- 
 "5f2a70cb71b2b8cc20b45bd12a2efa91" (a truly random sig)

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: Joel Klecker <jk@espy.org>

References:
- Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
  - From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@pasteur.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Next by Date: Re: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Previous by thread: Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Next by thread: Re: glibc 2.1 and compatibility (Was: slink is gone, goals for potato?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread