Re: intent to package zICQ
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 12:13:42PM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote:
> Doing a quick search on the mailing list archives, I found no such
> statement from Santiago.
> So, unless Santiago tells me I'm wrong, I'm assuming Santiago regards
> debmake as quite usable. And if I *am* wrong, the debmake
> documentation should at least tell me I am wrong. It doesn't now.
deb-make/debstd *is* quite usable, but the devel. corner on the
web page that is describing process of creating *new* packages is
reccomending dh-make/debhelper. AFAIK, developers are free to choose
their preffered packaging tools, these are *just* reccomendations,
not rules.
--
enJoy -*/\*- http://jagor.srce.hr/~jrodin/
Reply to: