On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 10:32:23AM +0200, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 04:35:39PM +1100, Chris Leishman wrote: > > Am I the only one who got a bad signature for this message? > > No, you aren't. Hmm. I wonder what caused that. Is it because I MIME-attached an additional file? The only OTHER time I've seen my own messages have bad signatures is when the body contained a "From" at the beginning of the line. I think that's because the MTA adds the ">", which happens after PGP has generated its message digest and the signature has been applied. Encrypted messages wouldn't have that problem. Maybe that's been fixed. Let's find out. From Any fellow mutt users want to help me track this one down? -- G. Branden Robinson | There's nothing an agnostic can't do Debian GNU/Linux | if he doesn't know whether he believes branden@ecn.purdue.edu | in it or not. cartoon.ecn.purdue.edu/~branden/ | -- Graham Chapman
Attachment:
pgph2SzsvA9EW.pgp
Description: PGP signature