Re: Y2K fix for emacs19(potato/slink) and emacs20(slink)

[Filip Van Raemdonck <filipvr@xs4all.be>]

Changwoo Ryu wrote:
> 
> Takuo KITAME <kitame@northeye.org> writes:
> 
> > >>>>> On Fri, 31 Dec 1999 17:58:56 +0900
> > >>>>> "TK" == kitame@northeye.org wrote...
> >
> > TK> Humm.. it's ad-hoc fix...
> > TK> Just modified MIN(1900 to 1970) and MAX(1999 to 2069) of year.
> >
> > TK> I think that it is nonsense but better than "00 is 1900".
> >
> > Anyway, we have no time to the Y2K.
> > I'll upload emacs19 and emacs20 to slink.
> >
> > (We got the Y2K in Japan, a happy new year!)
> 
> I think it is never an urgent thing to fix.
> 
> And I still doubt whether it's better to say the year XY (XY < 70) as
> 20XY.  Is it better to say "the year 68 is 2068", than "the year 68 is
> 1968"?
someone read the userfriendly comic today :-)
since 1k=1024 --> y2k=2048

LOL