[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

debian-user mangles mails



Here's an example:

> Return-path: <debian-user-request@lists.debian.org>
> Envelope-to: kai-debian-user@khms.westfalen.de
> Delivery-date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100
> Received: from uucp by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.11 #1)
> 	id 123LFF-0000CG-01 (Debian); Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100
> Received: from murphy.debian.org ([209.41.108.199])
> 	by muenster.westfalen.de with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
> 	id 123KeC-0004xK-00
> 	for kai-debian-user@khms.westfalen.de; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:04:22 +0100
> Received: (qmail 5231 invoked by uid 38); 29 Dec 1999 15:02:51 -0000
> Resent-Date: 29 Dec 1999 15:02:50 -0000
> Resent-Cc: recipient list not shown: ;
> X-Envelope-Sender: usenet@niet.webforce.com.hk
> X-Authentication-Warning: niet.webforce.com.hk: news set sender to
> usenet@debian.org.hk using -f To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: 29 Dec 1999 23:00:43 +0800
> From: grendel@vip.net.pl (Marek Habersack)
> Message-ID: <19991229155725.B22425@vip.net.pl>
> Organization: I just...
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
> Sender: usenet@niet.webforce.com.hk
> Reply-To: grendel@vip.net.pl
> Subject: su, sudo and resource limits
> Resent-Message-ID: <paxn0.A.ZRB.aKia4@murphy>
> Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> X-Mailing-List: <debian-user@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/76902
> X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: debian-user-request@lists.debian.org

Note that Content-Type: line?

Here's the same header from debian-devel:

> Return-Path: <debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org>
> Envelope-To: kai-debian-devel@khms.westfalen.de
> Delivery-Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:37 +0100
> Received: from uucp by khms.westfalen.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.11 #1)
> 	id 123LFE-0000CG-0A (Debian); Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:42:36 +0100
> Received: from murphy.debian.org ([209.41.108.199])
> 	by muenster.westfalen.de with smtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
> 	id 123Kbi-0004lA-00
> 	for kai-debian-devel@khms.westfalen.de; Wed, 29 Dec 1999 16:01:47 +0100
> Received: (qmail 323 invoked by uid 38); 29 Dec 1999 14:58:20 -0000
> Resent-Date: 29 Dec 1999 14:58:20 -0000
> Resent-CC: recipient list not shown: ;
> X-Envelope-Sender: grendel@vip.net.pl
> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 15:57:25 +0100
> From: Marek Habersack <grendel@vip.net.pl>
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: su, sudo and resource limits
> Message-Id: <19991229155725.B22425@vip.net.pl>
> Reply-To: grendel@vip.net.pl
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
> 	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zYM0uCDKw75PZbzx"
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
> Organization: I just...
> Resent-Message-Id: <4ty8uC.A.x_H.LGia4@murphy>
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> X-Mailing-List: <debian-devel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/51714
> X-Loop: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Precedence: list
> Resent-Sender: debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org

Note the second line. I assume something processing debian-user mails  
mishandles (that is, drops) continuation lines. Probably the same stuff  
that rearranges them (something that also should not happen).

MfG Kai


Reply to: