Re: ITP: ACS framework
On Thu, Dec 23, 1999 at 09:00:17AM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote:
> > > How about "ADCS"?
> > > or "ArsDigitaCS" ?
> > > Any comments?
> > adcs sounds OK; will that be recognised by its user base?
> Actually, I think to keep it less confusing I may call
> it acs-pg or acspg. This is sort of what they are calling
> this branch (ACS built for the Postgres RDBMS). I don't
> think the dash makes it clear that this is not your "acs",
> so perhaps "acspg" would be best.
Sounds good. I don't think the circuit simulator is likely to
need a postgres interface any time soon, either. :-)
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.