Re: Good optimize idea! (Re: ramblings about old hardware, gzip, bz2, and pentium opts)
On Tue, 7 Dec 1999, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> Onno <Onno@Willem.Alexanderschool.nl> writes:
>
> > At 03:04 PM 12/6/99 +0100, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:
> > [snip]
> > >Didnt mean : use 486-or-better-only instructions
> > >Mean : use optimalizations for 486 using only 386-or-better instructions
> > >Is this ok ?
> > >486 is much more similar to modern hardware than 386 was.
> >
> > This sounds reasonable.
> >
> > The old i386 stuff can still run it, but the binaries are
> > optimized for somewhat modern hardsware.
> >
> > Great idea indeed!
>
> gcc will ALWAYS produce code that runs on a i386, as I was
> told.
you were told wrong.
from gcc-2.95 manual:
`-mcpu=CPU TYPE'
Assume the defaults for the machine type CPU TYPE when scheduling
instructions. The choices for CPU TYPE are:
`i386' `i486' `i586' `i686'
`pentium' `pentiumpro' `k6'
While picking a specific CPU TYPE will schedule things
appropriately for that particular chip, the compiler will not
generate any code that does not run on the i386 without the
`-march=CPU TYPE' option being used. `i586' is equivalent to
`pentium' and `i686' is equivalent to `pentiumpro'. `k6' is the
AMD chip as opposed to the Intel ones.
`-march=CPU TYPE'
Generate instructions for the machine type CPU TYPE. The choices
for CPU TYPE are the same as for `-mcpu'. Moreover, specifying
`-march=CPU TYPE' implies `-mcpu=CPU TYPE'.
> Exceptions of cause are direct asm instructions in the code
> (like MMX optimizations).
i'm pretty sure comditional move will be emitted by gcc
if march=pentiumpro, and this code will NOT work on 386
> Its actually not a good idea, since slow systems will be even slower,
> fast systems will be slower and a very few machines with the exact
> hardware optimized for will gain a little bit.
>
> Also optimization is only worth for maybe 10-20 Package in Debian, so
> if you find one of them too slow patch it to compile for various
> optimizations and create multiple packages. (like gzip, gzip-mmx,
> gzip-P2 or similar).
>
> May the Source be with you.
> Goswin
OK
Reply to: