Re: Revoking ITP lsh
Christian Kurz wrote:
> since today nobody has suggest a good solution for the name clash and
> Joey Hess, the maintainer of lsh, ignored my emails, about this issue
What are you talking about? Whatever happened to the solution below?
(Oh, and notice my reply. Quit saying I'm ignoring you -- I'm not, but you
*are* getting on my nerves.)
On 03 Aug 99 Christian Kurz wrote:
> On 99-08-02 Joey Hess wrote:
> > Michael Stone wrote:
> > > I think there are going to be a lot more people looking for lsh the
> > > free ssh than lsh the dos compatability shell.
>
> > Yes, there certianly will be. The problem is that if the current lsh is
> > renamed and psst takes its place, then anyone who currently has lsh
> > installed and actually uses it will suddently find theri shell vanishes.
> > That's not very nice.
>
> After a dicussion with the author we decided to name it lsh-utils and
> make a conflict with lsh. He also will discuss on the mailing-list for
> lsh if the complete package will be renamed from lsh to lsh-utils
> because of the name conflict. I think we will find a good solution and
> hopefully change the name from lsh to lsh-utils. So from now the
> debian-package of lsh (free ssh) will be found under the name lsh-utils.
--
see shy jo
Reply to: