Re: New science section
In article <199911221759.MAA31682@mixing.qc.dfo.ca>,
GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (Peter S Galbraith) writes:
>
> Raul Miller wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 09:17:39AM -0600, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
>> > Why not just have a "Math & Science" section and be done with it?
How about symlinking? Mathpackages are put in the section they are most
commonly used (or most logically used) and in the mathsection.
Also, after looking through the available packages I think separating
the statistical and plotting packages from the other mathpackages would
be the most meaningful change right now.
/Patrik. (Not a developer).
Reply to: