Re: lyx_1.1.2-1 replaces lyx_1.0.4-3
GalbraithP@dfo-mpo.gc.ca (Peter S Galbraith) writes:
> Changes:
> lyx (1.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
>
I don't think that it's a good idea to replace a version released as
stable by the upstream developers with a devel version which is
considered by the very same upstream developers to be their devel
version for which they don't even guarantee proper compilation. :-\
I'd rather like to see something like a "lyx1.0_1.0.4" parallel to the
unstable "lyx1.1_1.1.2" instead. Debian users really shouldn't have
to be forced to be using bleeding edge software when perfectly stable
(almost) upstream versions are available.
Thanks, P. *8^)
--
------------ Paul Seelig <pseelig@mail.uni-mainz.de> -------------
African Music Archive - Institute for Ethnology and Africa Studies
Johannes Gutenberg-University - Forum 6 - 55099 Mainz/Germany
------------------- http://ntama.uni-mainz.de --------------------
Reply to: