Re: ITP: Debian History

[Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>]

On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 11:39:21AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
> > We already do this for the "standard" MTA, and nobody says exim is "the
> > only proper(tm)". You are still free to install whatever MTA you like
> > most.
> 
> exim is section:important
> apache is not even section:standard

exim has priority: important. The others have priority: extra.
Does this mean exim is "the only proper(tm)"? No.

Why would you call apache (or whatever httpd is chosen) "the only proper"
if it is made the only optional one, then?

Thanks.

-- 
 "1a52db05f760d02a4254f09a60f31405" (a truly random sig)