Re: Debian archive requirements
- To: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
- Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Debian archive requirements
- From: Adrian Bridgett <adrian.bridgett@iname.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 22:45:38 +0000
- Message-id: <19991104224538.B3897@wyvern>
- Mail-followup-to: Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Reply-to: adrian.bridgett@iname.com
- In-reply-to: <87r9i68a3q.fsf@raven.localnet>; from rlb@cs.utexas.edu on Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 11:01:13AM -0600
- References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991018014209.31634A-100000@localhost> <Pine.LNX.3.96.991018105558.2255A-100000@dysonsphere.ringworld.org> <19991018183618.A817@verbum.org> <19991018184703.G15774@justice.loyola.edu> <199910301228.NAA32332@paladin.demon.co.uk> <87r9i68a3q.fsf@raven.localnet>
On Thu, Nov 4, 1999 at 11:01:13 -0600 (+0000), Rob Browning wrote:
> John Lines <john@paladin.demon.co.uk> writes:
[snip]
> For my part, I'd like to see us dump the fixed directory tree as our
> main repository altogether. I think we should move the a keywords
> based scheme with one giant "hashed" directory tree (which fits in
Two points:
1) I don't want an "ls" over a modem to take 10mins to download so one giant
directory is a really bad idea.
2) How about using the first character. Here is a rough list of how many
packages this means per dir - x/ isn't half as bad as I expected, OTOH l/ is
pretty bad.
a: 150
b: 107
c: 207
d: 190
e: 105
f: 138
g: 310
h: 50
i: 132
j: 46
k: 66
l: 783
m: 174
n: 120
o: 46
p: 310
q: 27
r: 77
s: 263
t: 184
u: 44
v: 54
w: 132
x: 341
y: 18
z: 27
email: adrian.bridgett@iname.com, http://www.poboxes.com/adrian.bridgett
Windows NT - Unix in beta-testing. PGP key available on public key servers
Debian GNU/Linux -*- because I'm allergic to Prozac -*- www.debian.org
Reply to: