Re: Suggestion to and how to alow different compression for .debs
Joey Hess <joey@kitenet.net> writes:
> Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > Why not pipe it through "uncompress.sh" as and if present in the
> > control.tar.gz?
>
> Why not change to using the shar archive format for our packages?
>
> Because it's overly complicated, and unnecessary.
Whats complicated about using uncompress.sh instead of gzip and
fallback to gzip if not present?
The gain would be bzip2 compression, which is needed to reduce the
size of debian and also any other compressor that might become
commonly used or be extremly good at some sort of data.
Don´t tell me that saving 3-4 GB of mirror space is unnecessary.
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
Reply to: