[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] latest ash has broken 'echo' command



On Thu, Oct 21, 1999 at 08:09:32PM -0400, Franklin Belew wrote:
> 
> Upon closer inspection, the SuS defines the behaviour of an echo *utility*
> Therefore, if its a builtin it is no longer a utility, since utilities are
> separate.

utility

    A program that can be called by name from a shell to perform a
    specific task, or related set of tasks. This program is either an
    executable file, such as might be produced by a compiler or linker
    system from computer source code, or a file of shell source code,
    directly interpreted by the shell. The program may have been produced
    by the user, provided by the system implementor, or acquired from
    an independent distributor. The term utility does not apply to the
    special built-in utilities provided as part of the XSI Shell Command
    Language; see the XCU specification, Special Built-in Utilities . The
    system may implement certain utilities as shell functions (see the XCU
    specification, Function Definition Command ) or built-in utilities,
    but only an application that is aware of the command search order
    described in the XCU specification, Command Search and Execution
    or of performance characteristics can discern differences between
    the behaviour of such a function or built-in utility and that of a
    true executable file.
-- 
Debian GNU/Linux 2.1 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ )
Email:  Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt


Reply to: