On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 08:24:04PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote:
> I will NMU libwrap over the week-end to resolve the missing symbols
> bug (for which there's a patch in the BTS). I've contected the author
> 5 days ago without answer.
> Any objections ?
(a) No, go ahead.
(b) Yes, I'm not convinced that program trying to use libwrap should
be able to get away with not defining allow_severity and
deny_severity. And in any case I suspect the weak symbols should be
initialised to something meaningful rather than implicitly left as
`0' (LOG_INFO for allow and LOG_WARN for deny are what the other
tcp-wrapper utilities use).
Take your pick, I'm not really sure.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.
``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it
results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
-- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgp9dyjWAKAW6.pgp
Description: PGP signature