On Fri, Oct 15, 1999 at 08:24:04PM -0700, Philippe Troin wrote: > I will NMU libwrap over the week-end to resolve the missing symbols > bug (for which there's a patch in the BTS). I've contected the author > 5 days ago without answer. > Any objections ? (a) No, go ahead. (b) Yes, I'm not convinced that program trying to use libwrap should be able to get away with not defining allow_severity and deny_severity. And in any case I suspect the weak symbols should be initialised to something meaningful rather than implicitly left as `0' (LOG_INFO for allow and LOG_WARN for deny are what the other tcp-wrapper utilities use). Take your pick, I'm not really sure. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred. ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.'' -- Linus Torvalds
Attachment:
pgp9dyjWAKAW6.pgp
Description: PGP signature