[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bash package removing /bin/sh on upgrade



On Sun, Oct 03, 1999 at 09:44:25AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 1999 at 12:30:04PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Just having /bin/sh included in the .deb is Good Enough -- diversions
> > work as designed.
> Good Enough is not good enough (TM).

*shrug* Name a case where it fails.

> > There's a different preinst in one of the bug reports, ummm, #34717 I
> > think, that does the diversion stuff itself, too.
> That uses --rename, which is A Very Bad Thing in this case.

Whyso?

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. PGP encrypted mail preferred.

 ``The thing is: trying to be too generic is EVIL. It's stupid, it 
        results in slower code, and it results in more bugs.''
                                        -- Linus Torvalds

Attachment: pgp5Q9hJC0Dvg.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: