[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is XEmacs nonfree?

On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 12:54:32AM +0000, David Coe wrote:
> Is that still an accurate description of the legal status (from 
> FSF's perspective) of XEmacs, and if so, shouldn't we move it to
> non-free?

Huh? RMS is just complaining that they chose not to assign copyright to
the FSF. It's still GPL. There's no real question on the freedom of

David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org

Reply to: