Re: More pam_limits trouble
On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 05:09:05PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote:
> * Ben Collins said:
> > > > Hmmm...looking at the source, it wont accept a line with less than 4 arguments,
> > > > yet you are correct that the documentation say otherwise. Let me work on this.
> > > > I'll have it fixed in the next upload.
> > > I have attached a quick (and untested - I didn't have time to compile :((()
> > > fix. From looking at it, it should do.
> > >
> > > marek
> > This will work except that it should return PAM_IGNORE so that no limits get set.
> Correct. I didn't RTFS enough :))) - but it was first time I looked at the
> PAM source :)
I've got a fixed patch ready for uploading now. It also takes into account lines
like "@group -", so it should cover the documented format (GOD I hate the source
for this thing, nothing is documented right :/ ).