Steve Lamb wrote: > Monday, September 13, 1999, 8:25:17 AM, Peter wrote: > > > You are right, of course. Might mean the threat of package > > removal would only be made to fairly self-contained packages (We > > wouldn't remove `optional' gs either I'd bet). > > gs? Yeah. I bet we would not remove gs from a release if it had release-critical bugs (we'd have to fix them). It's too important of an optional package.