Re: Feaping Creature-ism in core Debian Packages
Steve Greenland wrote:
> On 12-Sep-99, 15:50 (CDT), Nicolás Lichtmaier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > > So though it's not in policy or anything, we sort of have a consensus, I
> > > think, that a package shouldn't rely on its docs being present.
> > Aren't there those packages that use gifs or html pages from their doc dir
> IMO, anything like that that package actually needs to run should be in
> /usr/lib or /usr/share/lib.
What would you do with documentation packages that want to be
accessible to dwww and as http://localhost/doc/PACKAGE ?
Packages like mh-book, tdlug, etc.
I would say `a package shouldn't rely on its docs being present',
but rather `executables shouldn't rely on docs being present'.