Re: Bug#39005: Mail loss over NFS with Kernel 2.2.*
"Marco d'Itri" <md@linux.it> writes:
> On Aug 23, Roland Rosenfeld <roland@debian.org> wrote:
>
> >In addition to this I think, that the Debian kernel-images should be
> >patched with the attached patch as well as with the 4 patches from the
> I strongly disagree. If the kernel has a bug it should be fixed
> upstream, most people compile their kernels from official source and
> don't expect this kind of subtle breakings.
It should be included, but also be send upstream to be included in the
next kernel release (my opinion). I want to have a working
kernel-image even if it means that it differs from the pristin kernel
source. Otherwise everybody has to go back and patch their own kernels.
May the Source be with you.
Goswin
Reply to: