Re: Bug#39005: Mail loss over NFS with Kernel 2.2.*
"Marco d'Itri" <md@linux.it> writes:
> On Aug 23, Roland Rosenfeld <roland@debian.org> wrote:
>
> >In addition to this I think, that the Debian kernel-images should be
> >patched with the attached patch as well as with the 4 patches from the
> I strongly disagree. If the kernel has a bug it should be fixed
> upstream, most people compile their kernels from official source and
> don't expect this kind of subtle breakings.
>
> I enabled fcntl locking in the last mutt.
Does that mean it uses only fcntl locking or the combination of
dotlocking and fcntl locking?
- Ruud de Rooij.
--
ruud de rooij | *@spam.ruud.org | http://ruud.org | http://weer.moonblade.net
Reply to: