On Sun, Aug 08, 1999 at 05:48:11PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote: > gecko@master.debian.org writes: > > > Please take a look at this list and fix your package if it's on here. (Or, > > you can explain why it should be allowed to violate policy or isn't > > violating policy). There *could* be bogus reports in here, too. In a week > > or two, we'll file Bugs against packages that are still unaddressed. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > --snip-- > > This list was generated from the hurd-i386 Packages file, > > dated: Thu Aug 5 19:15:28 1999. > > > > It excludes the checks which were already reported for the i386 > > architecture. > > > > Cannot satisfy with packages in main: > > * dict-elements: recommendations dictd, dict > > * dict-foldoc: recommendations dictd, dict > > * dict-web1913: recommendation dictd > --snip-- > > These packages passed your scan for i386, but failed on the > Hurd. It appears to me that the the binaries, dict and dictd, have > not yet been ported to the Hurd. I do not believe that is a bug > against my packages. > These packages should probably be removed from the hurd port until dict and dictd are ported.. then... but that's more opinion than anything else. I don't know who's responsibility that would be. -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <lintian-maint@debian.org> * * <webmaster@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> <webmaster@spi-inc.org> * =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpYjiEoHzsmq.pgp
Description: PGP signature