Re: libc6 has no sources??
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: Re: libc6 has no sources??
- From: Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho <email@example.com>
- Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 15:21:33 +0300
- Message-id: <19990801152133.C16913@ugh.jyu.fi.invalid>
- Mail-followup-to: firstname.lastname@example.org
- In-reply-to: <19990731224016.B16761@cibalia.gkvk.hr>; from Josip Rodin on Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 10:40:16PM +0200
- References: <19990731153645.A11413@bluegreen.dhis.org> <19990731154410.A9321@cosanostra.net> <19990731160544.A11661@bluegreen.dhis.org> <19990731224016.B16761@cibalia.gkvk.hr>
On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 10:40:16PM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> BTW you can always do `dpkg -s libc6 | grep Source:` and get the name of the
> source package.
Or "grep-status -PX -n -sSource libc6", which is faster and more
reliable than what you wrote (yours could be made as reliable with
grep-status is in potato package grep-dctrl (>= 0.9)
%%% Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho % email@example.com % http://www.iki.fi/gaia/ %%%
"... memory leaks are quite acceptable in many applications ..."
(Bjarne Stroustrup, The Design and Evolution of C++, page 220)