Matt Ryan <matt@banana.org.uk> writes: > I'm a big fan of small dependancies for packages. I can't see any reason why > we should start PAMifing packages when AFAICS it only gives the same > functionality as the NSS part of glibc. I have setup libnss-ldap and it works > very well - why would I need PAM? Can nss fallback or use pam? Otherwise I will still need pam for afs? Since afs is not free, changing is probably impossible. MfG, Goswin