[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ash vs. bash

On Mon, Jul 19, 1999 at 08:13:09PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>     Can you explain why one would want an interactive shell doing
> non-interactive work and vice versa?  To be honest, I never really got the
> logic of having scripting build into an interactive shell since they serve
> two different purposes.

So where can I download a version of bash that doesn't do interactive work?
I only use it for scripting, and tcsh for interactive work (but never
for scripting).

Do you see how silly this argument is yet?

Hamish Moffatt VK3SB (ex-VK3TYD). 
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome.

Reply to: