Re: [POLL] Should XEmacs 21.1 include the ldap support code?

To: "Karl M. Hegbloom" <karlheg@cathcart.sysc.pdx.edu>
Cc: "Debian Developers' Forum" <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [POLL] Should XEmacs 21.1 include the ldap support code?
From: Torsten Landschoff <t.landschoff@gmx.net>
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 1999 17:51:34 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 19990710175134.B14871@wormhole.galaxy>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87d7y2o3d8.fsf@bittersweet.sysc.pdx.edu>; from Karl M. Hegbloom on Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 09:26:27PM -0700
References: <[🔎] 87hfngujrk.fsf@bittersweet.sysc.pdx.edu> <[🔎] 19990708112840.A7835@arm.com> <[🔎] 87d7y2o3d8.fsf@bittersweet.sysc.pdx.edu>

On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 09:26:27PM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> 
>  Ok, so far I've recieved three responses (one off-list) in favor of
>  building XEmacs (21.1.4) with LDAP (openldap), and none against.
> 
>  Anyone else?  Any real reason to not build with LDAP support?  If
>  not, then I'll configure it in.

I think the only reason against would be a dependency pulled by the LDAP
support. Otherwise I am all for it.

Thanks
    Torsten

Attachment: pgpcX6bVhxa8T.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- [POLL] Should XEmacs 21.1 include the ldap support code?
  - From: karlheg@cathcart.sysc.pdx.edu (Karl M. Hegbloom)
- Re: [POLL] Should XEmacs 21.1 include the ldap support code?
  - From: Steve Haslam <araqnid@debian.org>
- Re: [POLL] Should XEmacs 21.1 include the ldap support code?
  - From: karlheg@cathcart.sysc.pdx.edu (Karl M. Hegbloom)

Prev by Date: Re: New lprng maintainer
Next by Date: How to handle FHS conversion?
Previous by thread: Re: [POLL] Should XEmacs 21.1 include the ldap support code?
Next by thread: Re: [POLL] Should XEmacs 21.1 include the ldap support code?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread