Re: Release management
>>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <email@example.com> writes:
Joseph> For an example of the problem, look at afterstep. Nice
Joseph> windowmanager. There are newer versions of it out there,
Joseph> new stable versions. The maintainer hasn't packaged them
Joseph> but has been promising he will for more than a month. The
Joseph> package is a nightmare. Lintian all but panics. The
Joseph> package conflicts with another package but doesn't declare
Joseph> its conflict (and in fact shouldn't conflict at all..) The
Joseph> new versions of menu don't even WORK with its dated menu
Joseph> format and the standards version on the package is I think
Joseph> 2.4.0. More still, it has a pile of release critical bugs
Joseph> against it.
Perhaps someone should grab a `can' and bail the maintainer out?
Often enough other things in people's lives must take precedence over
their free software activities.
Joseph> In such cases developers should be able to NMU these
Joseph> packages without worrying about complaints of package
Joseph> hijacking. Although in the case of afterstep, hijacking
Joseph> it doesn't seem like such a bad idea...
Maybe some work has already been done and a CVS vendor-tracking
repository could be started for it on a Debian server, where you and
other interested people can try and co-ordinate a bail-out effort, in
co-operation with the maintainer. (Who may well be a busy student
with books more important than a window manager that cannot be fully
understood until the books are all read?)