Re: policy change to 3.0.0: not before release? (was: Re: when move /usr/doc -> /usr/share/doc ?
>>"Jens" == Jens Ritter <email@example.com> writes:
Jens> Joseph Carter <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> Policy 126.96.36.199 will include FHS finally. I haven't looked at it closely
>> yet but /usr/doc/package/examples needs to be dealt with prior to moving
>> /usr/doc. Come to think of it, can anyone provide a real example of
>> something arch dependant that belongs in the examples directory?
Jens> I hope this change to policy will take place after the next release as
Jens> it means that all packages have to be recompiled and uploaded.
I think we need to come up with a upgrade path that allows for
incremental changes to the FHS. Also, I think we must not insist that
non-compliance with the FHS is a relese critical bug, in which case
we do not have to wait until the next relese cycle.
Jens> I think changes to policy that great should coincidence with the start
Jens> of a new development version.
I beg to disagree. I think that the FHS move is likely to be a
long one -- possibly longer than our release intervals (we are trying
to release faster, are we not?)
Jens> Is there some information on when the change to the new policy will
Jens> take place?
The new policy has already been uploaded.
Flirting is the gentle art of making a man feel pleased with
himself. Helen Rowland
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E